Landon v. Brown
28 A. 921, 160 Pa. 538, 1894 Pa. LEXIS 845
Opinion
We have considered this record with special reference to the [553] several questions presented by the specifications of error, and are not convinced that either of said specifications should be sustained. The questions involved have been so well considered and satisfactorily disposed of by the learned auditor that we think the decree should be affirmed for reasons given in his ■report.
Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed with costs to be paid by N. N. Betts, cashier, etc., appellant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Landon v. Brown, 28 A. 921, 160 Pa. 538, 1894 Pa. LEXIS 845 (Pa. 1894).
28 A. 921 (Landon v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Murphey v. Greybill
34 Pa. Super. 339 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1907)
Conlan v. Conlan
20 Pa. Super. 45 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1902)