Landmark Bank v. Sutton
825 S.W.2d 959, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 358, 1992 WL 42944
Opinion
ORDER
Appellant, Emerson Sutton, failed to appear for oral argument and his appeal from a judgment of revival of a judgment and a judgment for sanctions was submitted on the parties brief.
Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Landmark Bank v. Sutton, 825 S.W.2d 959, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 358, 1992 WL 42944 (Mo. Ct. App. 1992).
825 S.W.2d 959 (Landmark Bank v. Sutton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.