Home/Supreme Court/Landman v. Miedzinski

Landman v. Miedzinski

358 U.S. 644, 79 S. Ct. 537
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedFebruary 24, 1959
Docket589
StatusPublished

This text of 358 U.S. 644 (Landman v. Miedzinski) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Landman v. Miedzinski, 358 U.S. 644, 79 S. Ct. 537 (1959).

Opinion

358 U.S. 644 (1959)

LANDMAN ET AL.
v.
MIEDZINSKI, SHERIFF, ET AL.

No. 589.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided February 24, 1959.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND.

F. Joseph Donohue and Harold C. Faulkner for appellants.

C. Ferdinand Sybert, Attorney General of Maryland, Stedman Prescott, Jr., Deputy Attorney General, and James H. Norris, Jr. for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
358 U.S. 644, 79 S. Ct. 537, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/landman-v-miedzinski-scotus-1959.