Landis v. Shanklin

1 Smith & H. 78
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Landis v. Shanklin. Read the opinion of the Court — 1 Ind. 92
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided May 15, 1848·Published

Opinion

Held, That in an action on the ease for slander, the general issue and a plea of justification having been pleaded, an instruction re[79]*79quested by the defendant, to the effect; that if the jury found the plea of justification not fully sustained, but that the testimony strongly conduced to establish the larceny charged in it, that fact might go in mitigation of damages ; should have been given. Byrkett v. Monohan, 7 Blackf. 83; 1 id. 369; 6 id. 50.

Judgment reversed, sfec.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Landis v. Shanklin, 1 Smith & H. 78 (Ind. 1848).

1 Smith & H. 78 (Landis v. Shanklin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Byrket v. Monohon
7 Blackf. 83 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1844)