Landis v. Neff
9 A. 926, 7 Sadler 127, 1887 Pa. LEXIS 654
This text of 9 A. 926 (Landis v. Neff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Landis v. Neff, 9 A. 926, 7 Sadler 127, 1887 Pa. LEXIS 654 (Pa. 1887).
Opinion
An examination of the evidence convinces us tbat it presented a case proper for tbe jury. There is certainly some evidence tending to prove fraud. In the conflict of evidence the jury is the proper tribunal to weigh it and to determine what it proves. We discover no error in the admission of evidence or in the charge.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Commonwealth v. Rasefske
17 Pa. D. & C. 204 (Washington County Court of Quarter Sessions, 1931)
Ralph v. FonDersmith
10 Pa. Super. 481 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1899)
Joseph Schoeneman & Co. v. Weill
3 Pa. Super. 119 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1896)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
9 A. 926, 7 Sadler 127, 1887 Pa. LEXIS 654, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/landis-v-neff-pa-1887.