Landis v. Henderson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Landis v. Henderson

88 N.W. 1103, 85 Minn. 246, 1902 Minn. LEXIS 376

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedJanuary 17, 1902

DocketNos. 12,777-(162)

StatusPublished

This text of 88 N.W. 1103 (Landis v. Henderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Landis v. Henderson, 88 N.W. 1103, 85 Minn. 246, 1902 Minn. LEXIS 376 (Mich. 1902).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Whatever merit there may have been in this appeal as the record stood prior to an amendment to the bill of exceptions and to the return, it is now clear that no error was committed at the trial,' and that the one relied upon by appellant’s counsel was wholly based upon an omission in the bill, carried forward into the return, and then corrected by amendment, as before stated. This compels an affirmation of this judgment appealed from, and it is so ordered.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Whatever merit there may have been in this appeal as the record stood prior to an amendment to the bill of exceptions and to the return, it is now clear that no error was committed at the trial,' and that the one relied upon by appellant’s counsel was wholly based upon an omission in the bill, carried forward into the return, and then corrected by amendment, as before stated. This compels an affirmation of this judgment appealed from, and it is so ordered.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

88 N.W. 1103, 85 Minn. 246, 1902 Minn. LEXIS 376, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/landis-v-henderson-minn-1902.