Landi v. Engelman

205 So. 2d 687
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 5, 1967·No. No. 67-210·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on the authority of Alberts v. Schneiderman, Fla.App.1966, 182 So.2d 50; Buttles v. Smith, 281 N.Y. 226, 22 N.E.2d 350 (1939); Buckley v. Stansfield, 214 N. Y. 679, 108 N.E. 1090 (1915); Darcey v. Brooklyn and N. Y. Ferry Co., 196 N.Y. 99, 89 N.E. 461, 26 L.R.A.,N.S., 267 (1909), and Bugeja v. Davis, 34 Misc.2d 276, 228 N.Y.S.2d 216 (1962).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Landi v. Engelman, 205 So. 2d 687 (Fla. Ct. App. 1967).

205 So. 2d 687 (Landi v. Engelman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Alberts v. Schneiderman
182 So. 2d 50 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1966)
Buckley v. . Stansfield
108 N.E. 1090 (New York Court of Appeals, 1915)
Buttles v. Smith
22 N.E.2d 350 (New York Court of Appeals, 1939)
Darcy v. Brooklyn & New York Ferry Co.
89 N.E. 461 (New York Court of Appeals, 1909)
Bugeja v. Davis
34 Misc. 2d 276 (New York Supreme Court, 1962)