Landgraff v. Nicoll
46 N.Y.S. 1095
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedAugust 4, 1897
StatusPublished
This text of 46 N.Y.S. 1095 (Landgraff v. Nicoll) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Landgraff v. Nicoll, 46 N.Y.S. 1095 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1897).
Opinion
The order must be reversed on the ground that there is no proof of any authority on the part of the attorneys for the Lloyds Company to represent the defendant Charles H. Nicoll, or to bind him by any contract of insurance. The order should be reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with $10 costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
46 N.Y.S. 1095, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/landgraff-v-nicoll-nyappdiv-1897.