Landers v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Landers v. State

422 S.W.3d 532, 2014 WL 537758, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 133

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 11, 2014·No. No. ED 99308·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Charles A. Landers (Movant) appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. Movant contends the motion court erred in denying his claim that counsel was ineffective for failing to properly cross-examine a witness.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the motion court’s decision was not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Charles A. Landers (Movant) appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. Movant contends the motion court erred in denying his claim that counsel was ineffective for failing to properly cross-examine a witness.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the motion court’s decision was not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Landers v. State, 422 S.W.3d 532, 2014 WL 537758, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 133 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

422 S.W.3d 532 (Landers v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.