Landers v. Howell Motors, Inc.

2021 NY Slip Op 01904, 192 A.D.3d 1669, 141 N.Y.S.3d 387
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 26, 2021
Docket271 CA 19-02363
StatusPublished

This text of 2021 NY Slip Op 01904 (Landers v. Howell Motors, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Landers v. Howell Motors, Inc., 2021 NY Slip Op 01904, 192 A.D.3d 1669, 141 N.Y.S.3d 387 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

Landers v Howell Motors, Inc. (2021 NY Slip Op 01904)
Landers v Howell Motors, Inc.
2021 NY Slip Op 01904
Decided on March 26, 2021
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on March 26, 2021 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: PERADOTTO, J.P., CARNI, NEMOYER, TROUTMAN, AND WINSLOW, JJ.

271 CA 19-02363

[*1]ONNALEE F. LANDERS, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF FRANCIS J. LANDERS, DECEASED, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v

HOWELL MOTORS, INC. AND MICHAEL J. LANDERS, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.


HODGSON RUSS LLP, BUFFALO (GARRY M. GRABER OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

MUSCATO, DIMILLO & VONA, LLP, LOCKPORT (GEORGE V.C. MUSCATO OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.



Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Niagara County (Frank Caruso, J.), entered November 26, 2019. The order denied the motion of defendants for summary judgment.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: In this litigation arising from a dispute over the ownership of a motor vehicle, defendants appeal from an order denying their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. We affirm. Ownership of a vehicle passes "when the parties intend that it pass" (Abele Tractor & Equip. Co., Inc. v Schaeffer, 188 AD3d 1500, 1502 [3d Dept 2020] [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Cunningham v Ford, 20 AD3d 897, 897-898 [4th Dept 2005]), and defendants' own evidentiary submissions created an issue of fact whether defendant Howell Motors, Inc., intended to transfer ownership of the subject vehicle to plaintiff's decedent prior to his death (see generally Abele Tractor & Equip. Co., Inc., 188 AD3d at 1503; Portillo v Carlson, 167 AD3d 792, 793 [2d Dept 2018]; Duger v Estate of Carey, 307 AD2d 675, 676 [3d Dept 2003]).

Entered: March 26, 2021

Mark W. Bennett

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Duger v. Carey
307 A.D.2d 675 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Cunningham v. Ford
20 A.D.3d 897 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2021 NY Slip Op 01904, 192 A.D.3d 1669, 141 N.Y.S.3d 387, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/landers-v-howell-motors-inc-nyappdiv-2021.