Landers v. City of Austin

278 S.W. 466
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedNovember 18, 1925
DocketNo. 6935.
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 278 S.W. 466 (Landers v. City of Austin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Landers v. City of Austin, 278 S.W. 466 (Tex. Ct. App. 1925).

Opinion

McClendon, C. J.

The only grounds of review of the trial court’s judgment urged in this appeal are those which question the propriety of an order setting aside a judgment by default. The order complained of was made at the same term of court at which the default judgment was entered; and the authorities in this state are clear to the effect that the trial court has the power, whether or. not good or adequate cause therefor is shown, to set aside a default judgment or grant a new trial during the term at which the judgment is rendered. The discretion lodged in the trial court in this regard is not subject to review. El Paso & S. W. R. Co. v. Kelley, 99 Tex. 87, 87 S. W. 660; Cohen v. Moore, 101 Tex. 45, 104 S. W. 1053; Goss v. McClaren, 17 Tex. 107, 67 Am. Dec. 646; Sweeney v. Jarvis, 6 Tex. 36; Lawther Grain Co. v. Winniford (Tex. Com. App.) 249 S. W. 195.

The trial court’s judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Simpson v. Glenn
103 S.W.2d 433 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1937)
McCook v. Amarada Petroleum Corp.
93 S.W.2d 482 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1936)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
278 S.W. 466, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/landers-v-city-of-austin-texapp-1925.