Landers v. Bell Atlantic Network Services, Inc.

Fourth Circuit

Landers v. Bell Atlantic Network Services, Inc.

73 F.3d 357, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 40382, 1995 WL 758373

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedDecember 26, 1995

Docket95-1919

StatusPublished

This text of 73 F.3d 357 (Landers v. Bell Atlantic Network Services, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Landers v. Bell Atlantic Network Services, Inc., 73 F.3d 357, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 40382, 1995 WL 758373 (4th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

73 F.3d 357
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Thomasene D. LANDERS, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
BELL ATLANTIC NETWORK SERVICES, INCORPORATED; The
Chesapeake and Potomac Telephone Company of
Maryland; Bonnie Henderson; Jo A.
Tollenger Defendants--Appellees.

No. 95-1919.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 14, 1995.
Decided Dec. 26, 1995.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing her employment discrimination action for failure to cooperate with discovery and to respond to orders of the district court. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Landers v. Bell Atlantic Network Servs., Inc., No. CA-93-1775-JFM (D.Md. Mar. 23, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

73 F.3d 357
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Thomasene D. LANDERS, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
BELL ATLANTIC NETWORK SERVICES, INCORPORATED; The
Chesapeake and Potomac Telephone Company of
Maryland; Bonnie Henderson; Jo A.
Tollenger Defendants--Appellees.

No. 95-1919.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 14, 1995.
Decided Dec. 26, 1995.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing her employment discrimination action for failure to cooperate with discovery and to respond to orders of the district court. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Landers v. Bell Atlantic Network Servs., Inc., No. CA-93-1775-JFM (D.Md. Mar. 23, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

73 F.3d 357, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 40382, 1995 WL 758373, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/landers-v-bell-atlantic-network-services-inc-ca4-1995.