Landerman v. McKinson

28 Ky. 234, 5 J.J. Marsh. 234, 1830 Ky. LEXIS 424
CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky
DecidedDecember 28, 1830
StatusPublished

This text of 28 Ky. 234 (Landerman v. McKinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Landerman v. McKinson, 28 Ky. 234, 5 J.J. Marsh. 234, 1830 Ky. LEXIS 424 (Ky. Ct. App. 1830).

Opinion

Judge Buckner

delivered the opinion of the court.

To reverse the decree entered in this case, Landerman prosecutes this writ of error.

The decree is erroneous for several reasons- in the first place, because current interest is allowed on the sum of $575 j in the second, because the sum on which the ten per centum damages are decreed, is not stated in the decree. The clerk is left to ascertain it by a calculation, under directions which might, from the manner in which they are given, be readily misapprehended.

Whether the .decree is erroneous in the calculation made of the payments, interest, &c., we have not entered into a minute examination. The cause was badly prepared for trial, and the record made out in a manner which, in some respects, renders it unintelligible.

The decree of the circuit court must be reversed, and the cause remanded to that court, for further proceedings to be had, placing the cause in a situation to enable the court to do justice between the parties, and for a decree to be entered not inconsistent with this opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
28 Ky. 234, 5 J.J. Marsh. 234, 1830 Ky. LEXIS 424, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/landerman-v-mckinson-kyctapp-1830.