Landell v. Board of Conservation & Development
132 A. 922, 102 N.J.L. 441, 1926 N.J. LEXIS 191
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Black in the Supreme Court.
*442 For affirmanc e — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Katzenbach, Lloyd, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Landell v. Board of Conservation & Development, 132 A. 922, 102 N.J.L. 441, 1926 N.J. LEXIS 191 (N.J. 1926).
132 A. 922 (Landell v. Board of Conservation & Development) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.