Landcastle Acquisition Corp. v. Renasant Bank

63 F.4th 1
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Landcastle Acquisition Corp. v. Renasant Bank. Read the opinion of the Court — 57 F.4th 1203
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided March 20, 2023·No. 20-13735·Published

Opinion

In the

United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

No. 20-13735

LANDCASTLE ACQUISITION CORP., Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus RENASANT BANK,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia D.C. Docket No. 2:17-cv-00275-RWS

2 Order of the Court 20-13735

Before WILLIAM PRYOR, Chief Judge, WILSON, JORDAN, ROSENBAUM, JILL PRYOR, NEWSOM, BRANCH, GRANT, LUCK, LAGOA, and BRASHER, Circuit Judges. BY THE COURT:

A petition for rehearing having been filed and a member of this Court in active service having requested a poll on whether this case should be reheard by the Court sitting en banc, and a majority of the judges in active service on this Court having voted against granting rehearing en banc, it is ORDERED that this case will not be reheard en banc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Landcastle Acquisition Corp. v. Renasant Bank, 63 F.4th 1 (11th Cir. 2023).

63 F.4th 1 (Landcastle Acquisition Corp. v. Renasant Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.