Landau v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad

115 A.D. 921, 101 N.Y.S. 1128

This text of 115 A.D. 921 (Landau v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Landau v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad, 115 A.D. 921, 101 N.Y.S. 1128 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1906).

Opinion

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except Nash and Kruse, JJ., who dissented upon the. ground that the court permitted an improper cross-examination of the plaintiff as to her occupation. ' ' -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
115 A.D. 921, 101 N.Y.S. 1128, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/landau-v-new-york-central-hudson-river-railroad-nyappdiv-1906.