Landau v. Fleet Call, Inc.

210 A.D.2d 156, 621 N.Y.S.2d 853

This text of 210 A.D.2d 156 (Landau v. Fleet Call, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Landau v. Fleet Call, Inc., 210 A.D.2d 156, 621 N.Y.S.2d 853 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Myriam Altman, J.), entered October 21, 1993, which granted defendants’ motion for a default judgment unless plaintiff served a verified reply to defendants’ counterclaims within 10 days, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

We find that plaintiff’s attorney’s failure to serve a timely answer to defendants’ counterclaims was due to his mistaken belief that a reply had already been served, that the brief delay caused defendants no prejudice, and that the affidavit of plaintiff’s attorney was adequate for purposes of showing a meritorious defense (see, Epstein v Lenox Hill Hosp., 108 AD2d 616, 617, amended 114 AD2d 824; Mufalli v Ford Motor Co., 105 AD2d 642, 643-644). Accordingly, it was a proper exercise of discretion, to extend plaintiff’s time to serve a reply (CPLR 3012 [d]). Concur—Ellerin, J. P., Ross, Rubin, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mufalli v. Ford Motor Co.
105 A.D.2d 642 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
Epstein v. Lenox Hill Hospital
108 A.D.2d 616 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
Epstein v. Lenox Hill Hospital
114 A.D.2d 824 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
210 A.D.2d 156, 621 N.Y.S.2d 853, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/landau-v-fleet-call-inc-nyappdiv-1994.