Landau v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States

168 Misc. 327, 6 N.Y.S.2d 112, 1938 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1802

This text of 168 Misc. 327 (Landau v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Landau v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States, 168 Misc. 327, 6 N.Y.S.2d 112, 1938 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1802 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The clause in the policy exempting disability benefits from incontestability is not ambiguous and was regarded as sufficient in (Apter v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc., 271 N. Y. 653; Kushman v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc., 253 App. Div. 921; Equitable Life Assur. Soc. v. Deem, 91 Fed. [2d] 569).

Judgment reversed, with thirty dollars costs, and complaint dismissed on the merits, with costs.

All concur. Present — Hammer, Shientag and Noonan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kushman v. Equitable Life Assurance Society
253 A.D. 921 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1938)
Apter v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States
271 N.Y. 653 (New York Court of Appeals, 1936)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
168 Misc. 327, 6 N.Y.S.2d 112, 1938 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1802, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/landau-v-equitable-life-assurance-society-of-united-states-nyappterm-1938.