Landahl v. North American Co.

118 So. 2d 215
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJanuary 22, 1960
DocketNo. 30045
StatusPublished

This text of 118 So. 2d 215 (Landahl v. North American Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Landahl v. North American Co., 118 So. 2d 215 (Fla. 1960).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Noting potential jurisdiction we granted certiorari and have now heard the matter on the merits. Being of the view that the decision of the Court of Appeal, Second District, 113 So.2d 588, does not conflict with a prior decision of this Court on the same point of law the writ is discharged on authority of Ansin v. Thurston, Fla., 101 So.2d 808 and Florida Power & Light Co. v. Bell, Fla., 113 So.2d 697. Also see Commercial Credit Corporation v. Varn, Fla.App., 108 So.2d 638.

It is so ordered.

THOMAS, C. J., and TERRELL, ROBERTS, DREW, THORNAL and O’CONNELL, JJ., and McCRARY, Circuit Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commercial Credit Corporation v. Varn
108 So. 2d 638 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1959)
Ansin v. Thurston
101 So. 2d 808 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1958)
Florida Power & Light Co. v. Bell
113 So. 2d 697 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1959)
North American Co. v. Landahl
113 So. 2d 588 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1959)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
118 So. 2d 215, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/landahl-v-north-american-co-fla-1960.