Landahl v. North American Co.

118 So. 2d 215
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided January 22, 1960·No. No. 30045·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Noting potential jurisdiction we granted certiorari and have now heard the matter on the merits. Being of the view that the decision of the Court of Appeal, Second District, 113 So.2d 588, does not conflict with a prior decision of this Court on the same point of law the writ is discharged on authority of Ansin v. Thurston, Fla., 101 So.2d 808 and Florida Power & Light Co. v. Bell, Fla., 113 So.2d 697. Also see Commercial Credit Corporation v. Varn, Fla.App., 108 So.2d 638.

It is so ordered.

THOMAS, C. J., and TERRELL, ROBERTS, DREW, THORNAL and O’CONNELL, JJ., and McCRARY, Circuit Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Landahl v. North American Co., 118 So. 2d 215 (Fla. 1960).

118 So. 2d 215 (Landahl v. North American Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commercial Credit Corporation v. Varn
108 So. 2d 638 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1959)
Ansin v. Thurston
101 So. 2d 808 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1958)
Florida Power & Light Co. v. Bell
113 So. 2d 697 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1959)
North American Co. v. Landahl
113 So. 2d 588 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1959)