Land v. Stonestreet (In re Land)

D. Nebraska

Land v. Stonestreet (In re Land)

86 B.R. 625, 1988 Bankr. LEXIS 862

CourtUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nebraska

DecidedJune 13, 1988

DocketBankruptcy No. 85-00868; Adv. No. A88-4025

StatusPublished

This text of 86 B.R. 625 (Land v. Stonestreet (In re Land)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nebraska primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Land v. Stonestreet (In re Land), 86 B.R. 625, 1988 Bankr. LEXIS 862 (Neb. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

JOHN C. MINAHAN, Jr., Bankruptcy Judge.

The defendant, Timothy J. Mahoney, has moved to dismiss under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(5) & (6), and also on the theory of immunity. The motion is accompanied by an affidavit. When matters outside the pleadings are presented on a motion to dismiss, and the motion is treated as a motion for summary judgment under Rule 56, “all parties shall be given reasonable opportunity to present all material made pertinent to such motion by Rule 56.” Court v. Hall County, 725 F.2d 1170, 1172 (8th Cir.1984). The motion is hereby taken under advisement to be determined by the Court after plaintiffs have been provided an opportunity to respond.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that the defendant’s motion to dismiss (Fil. # 24), will be treated as a motion for summary judgment and the plaintiffs will be given until June 27, 1988, to present evidence in the form of an affidavit in compliance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(e).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

JOHN C. MINAHAN, Jr., Bankruptcy Judge.

The defendant, Timothy J. Mahoney, has moved to dismiss under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(5) & (6), and also on the theory of immunity. The motion is accompanied by an affidavit. When matters outside the pleadings are presented on a motion to dismiss, and the motion is treated as a motion for summary judgment under Rule 56, “all parties shall be given reasonable opportunity to present all material made pertinent to such motion by Rule 56.” Court v. Hall County, 725 F.2d 1170, 1172 (8th Cir.1984). The motion is hereby taken under advisement to be determined by the Court after plaintiffs have been provided an opportunity to respond.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that the defendant’s motion to dismiss (Fil. # 24), will be treated as a motion for summary judgment and the plaintiffs will be given until June 27, 1988, to present evidence in the form of an affidavit in compliance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(e).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

86 B.R. 625, 1988 Bankr. LEXIS 862, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/land-v-stonestreet-in-re-land-nebraskab-1988.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack