Land v. State
This text of 709 S.W.2d 671 (Land v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION
Appellant was convicted of the offense of theft of cattle. On appeal, a panel majority of the Austin Court of Appeals held that the time between a no bill from a grand jury and the true bill of indictment brought by a second grand jury was properly ex-cludable under Sec. 4(10) of the Speedy Trial Act, Art. 32A.02, C.C.P., as an exceptional circumstance. Land v. State, 695 S.W.2d 712 (Tex.App.-Austin 1985). We refuse the petition for discretionary review, however, our refusal of appellant’s petition for discretionary review is not to be taken as an approval of the reasoning of the Court of Appeals on this ground of error.
With this understanding, we refuse appellant’s petition for discretionary review.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
709 S.W.2d 671, 1986 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 735, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/land-v-state-texcrimapp-1986.