Land v. Jolley

166 S.E. 217, 175 Ga. 788, 1932 Ga. LEXIS 332
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedOctober 13, 1932
DocketNo. 8877
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 166 S.E. 217 (Land v. Jolley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Land v. Jolley, 166 S.E. 217, 175 Ga. 788, 1932 Ga. LEXIS 332 (Ga. 1932).

Opinion

Russell, C. J.

1. The costs in a criminal prosecution are collectible of the defendant by the levy of a fi. fa. at the termination of a prosecution, if it finally results in the conviction of the defendant. Under the provisions of the Civil Code (1910), §§ 5991, 5992, the amount of each item must be '“distinctly stated in figures; and no costs, or items of costs, shall in any case be demanded by any such officer, which are not itemized and endorsed as herein provided.”

2. Where one accused of crime is convicted, but upon a subsequent trial granted is thereafter acquitted, the defendant is no longer liable for the costs.

3. The court did not err in overruling demurrers to a petition which set forth allegations substantially containing the averments of the two foregoing headnotes, and praying that fi. fas. for costs which had been issued be canceled as a cloud upon petitioner’s property, and also praying for subrogation, as set forth in the petition.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Atkinson, J., absent. T. G. Head and McClure & McClure, for plaintiffs in error. B. Carter Piitman, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Doty v. Goodwin
437 S.W.2d 233 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
166 S.E. 217, 175 Ga. 788, 1932 Ga. LEXIS 332, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/land-v-jolley-ga-1932.