Land v. GEORGIA REAL ESTATE COMMISSION

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Land v. GEORGIA REAL ESTATE COMMISSION

237 S.E.2d 243, 142 Ga. App. 860, 1977 Ga. App. LEXIS 2151

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJuly 14, 1977

Docket53887

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 237 S.E.2d 243 (Land v. GEORGIA REAL ESTATE COMMISSION) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Land v. GEORGIA REAL ESTATE COMMISSION, 237 S.E.2d 243, 142 Ga. App. 860, 1977 Ga. App. LEXIS 2151 (Ga. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

Smith, Judge.

The Georgia Real Estate Commission revoked Land’s real estate broker’s license after finding that he had advertised to buy real estate without indicating that he was a licensed broker and that he had failed to maintain several earnest money deposits in an escrow account. Land appealed to the superior court and the commission was affirmed; he now appeals to this court. The record reveals substantial evidence to support the commission’s findings; indeed, Land admitted the violations and attempted only to show mitigation. The superior court correctly affirmed the findings. Flowers v. Ga. Real Estate Commission, 141 Ga. App. 105 (232 SE2d 586). Revocation of the license, even after hearing evidence of mitigation, was within the commission’s discretion. Code § 84-1421.

Judgment affirmed.

Bell, C. J., and McMurray, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith, Judge.

The Georgia Real Estate Commission revoked Land’s real estate broker’s license after finding that he had advertised to buy real estate without indicating that he was a licensed broker and that he had failed to maintain several earnest money deposits in an escrow account. Land appealed to the superior court and the commission was affirmed; he now appeals to this court. The record reveals substantial evidence to support the commission’s findings; indeed, Land admitted the violations and attempted only to show mitigation. The superior court correctly affirmed the findings. Flowers v. Ga. Real Estate Commission, 141 Ga. App. 105 (232 SE2d 586). Revocation of the license, even after hearing evidence of mitigation, was within the commission’s discretion. Code § 84-1421.

Judgment affirmed.

Bell, C. J., and McMurray, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

237 S.E.2d 243, 142 Ga. App. 860, 1977 Ga. App. LEXIS 2151, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/land-v-georgia-real-estate-commission-gactapp-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack