Land v. Beck
This text of Land v. Beck (Land v. Beck) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-6679
BILLY LAND,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
THEODIS BECK, Secretary of Correction; JAMES B. BENNETT, Director of Prisons; GRADY J. HAYNES, Superintendent of Warren Correctional; HATTIE B. PIMPONG, Chief Disciplinary Hearing Officer; ROBERT TERRY, JR., Hearing Officer; LT. NORWOOD; J. R. JAMES, Lieutenant; T. BROWN, Officer; D. HARDING, Officer; A. PATTERSON,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CA-01-533-5-BO)
Submitted: June 20, 2002 Decided: June 27, 2002
Before MICHAEL and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Billy Land, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Billy Land, a Virginia prisoner, appeals the district court’s
order denying his self-styled “motion for hearing.” We have
reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no
reversible error. Land claims the district court must conduct a
hearing to determine the constitutionality of a refundable ten
dollar administrative fee imposed upon inmates who file internal
grievances against prison officials. We have already rejected
Land’s claim in a prior opinion. See Land v. Beck, No. 01-7386,
slip op. (4th Cir. Dec. 28, 2001). Therefore, Land’s claim is
barred under principles of res judicata. Accordingly, we affirm
the judgment of the district court. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Land v. Beck, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/land-v-beck-ca4-2002.