Land Associates, Inc. v. Becker

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Land Associates, Inc. v. Becker

647 P.2d 989, 58 Or. App. 216, 1982 Ore. App. LEXIS 3560

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedJuly 14, 1982

DocketNo. 16-79-06159, CA A22290

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 647 P.2d 989 (Land Associates, Inc. v. Becker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Land Associates, Inc. v. Becker, 647 P.2d 989, 58 Or. App. 216, 1982 Ore. App. LEXIS 3560 (Or. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff seller in this action on a land sale contract obtained a judgment against the defendant-buyer, purchased the property at a sheriffs sale and subsequently received a sheriffs deed. Intervenor is the assignee of three junior lienholders, all of whom acquired their interests in the property while this action was pending but before the sale took place. Plaintiff did not join intervenor or her assignors as defendants. The intervenor appeals from the dismissal of her second amended complaint through which she sought, first, to have the deed and the order directing issuance of the deed set aside and, second, an order permitting her to exercise “statutory redemption procedures with respect to the real property.” (Emphasis added.) Intervenor does not have statutory redemption rights under these circumstances. Portland Mtg. Co. v. Creditors Prot. Ass’n, 199 Or 432, 262 P2d 918 (1953).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff seller in this action on a land sale contract obtained a judgment against the defendant-buyer, purchased the property at a sheriffs sale and subsequently received a sheriffs deed. Intervenor is the assignee of three junior lienholders, all of whom acquired their interests in the property while this action was pending but before the sale took place. Plaintiff did not join intervenor or her assignors as defendants. The intervenor appeals from the dismissal of her second amended complaint through which she sought, first, to have the deed and the order directing issuance of the deed set aside and, second, an order permitting her to exercise “statutory redemption procedures with respect to the real property.” (Emphasis added.) Intervenor does not have statutory redemption rights under these circumstances. Portland Mtg. Co. v. Creditors Prot. Ass’n, 199 Or 432, 262 P2d 918 (1953).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

647 P.2d 989, 58 Or. App. 216, 1982 Ore. App. LEXIS 3560, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/land-associates-inc-v-becker-orctapp-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack