Lanciano v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America
This text of 140 Misc. 651 (Lanciano v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Although the evidence does not require a finding that there was a breach of the condition of sound health at the date of the policy, reversible error is presented by the ruling of the trial judge excluding the testimony of the physician called by the defendant, who examined the assured during her last illness, as to her condition at the time of such examination, plaintiff’s counsel having previously, upon examination of another physician, disclosed the cause of the patient’s death. (Capron v. Douglass, 193 N. Y. 11.)
Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with thirty dollars costs to appellant to abide the event.
All concur; present, Levy, Callahan and Untermyer, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
140 Misc. 651, 251 N.Y.S. 530, 1931 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1448, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lanciano-v-prudential-insurance-co-of-america-nyappterm-1931.