Lanciano v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America

140 Misc. 651, 251 N.Y.S. 530, 1931 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1448

This text of 140 Misc. 651 (Lanciano v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lanciano v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America, 140 Misc. 651, 251 N.Y.S. 530, 1931 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1448 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Although the evidence does not require a finding that there was a breach of the condition of sound health at the date of the policy, reversible error is presented by the ruling of the trial judge excluding the testimony of the physician called by the defendant, who examined the assured during her last illness, as to her condition at the time of such examination, plaintiff’s counsel having previously, upon examination of another physician, disclosed the cause of the patient’s death. (Capron v. Douglass, 193 N. Y. 11.)

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with thirty dollars costs to appellant to abide the event.

All concur; present, Levy, Callahan and Untermyer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Capron v. . Douglass
85 N.E. 827 (New York Court of Appeals, 1908)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
140 Misc. 651, 251 N.Y.S. 530, 1931 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1448, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lanciano-v-prudential-insurance-co-of-america-nyappterm-1931.