Lancette v. Crouse-Irving Memorial Hospital, Inc.

81 A.D.2d 1002, 442 N.Y.S.2d 963, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11749

Opinion

•— Order unanimously reversed, without costs, and motion denied. Memorandum: The moving papers do not state an acceptable excuse for plaintiffs’ failure to request removal of the case from the general docket within the one-year period required by the rules and previous decisions of this court (see CPLR 3404; 22 NYCRR 1024.8, 1024.12, 1024.13 [a]; Goetzmann v Continental Cas. Co., 70 AD2d 1046). Accordingly, Special Term abused its discretion in granting the motion to restore. (Appeal from order of Onondaga Supreme Court —• restore to calendar.) Present — Dillon, P.J., Cardamone, Simons, Denman and Schnepp, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lancette v. Crouse-Irving Memorial Hospital, Inc., 81 A.D.2d 1002, 442 N.Y.S.2d 963, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11749 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1981).

81 A.D.2d 1002 (Lancette v. Crouse-Irving Memorial Hospital, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Goetzmann v. Continental Casualty Co.
70 A.D.2d 1046 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1979)