Lance Wood v. Keith Yordy

357 F. App'x 872
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedDecember 14, 2009
Docket09-35594
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 357 F. App'x 872 (Lance Wood v. Keith Yordy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lance Wood v. Keith Yordy, 357 F. App'x 872 (9th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Idaho state prisoner Lance Wood appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying his motion for a preliminary injunction in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that prison officials retaliated against him for exercising his right to access the courts. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1), and we affirm.

We express no view on the merits of the complaint. Our sole inquiry is whether the district court abused its discretion in denying preliminary injunctive relief. The Lands Council v. McNair, 537 F.3d 981, 986 (9th Cir.2008); see Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, — U.S. -, 129 S.Ct. 365, 374, 172 L.Ed.2d 249 (2008) (listing factors for district court to consider). We conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order denying the preliminary injunction.

AFFIRMED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
357 F. App'x 872, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lance-wood-v-keith-yordy-ca9-2009.