Lance v. Williams

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: April 22, 2004
• Docket: 04-1066
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-1066

JESSE R. LANCE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

MAY ALICE WILLIAMS; DEPUTY PORTER; JAMES BECKETT; DIANA BECKETT,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Sol Blatt, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-02-1316-2)

Submitted: April 15, 2004 Decided: April 22, 2004

Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jesse R. Lance, Appellant Pro Se. William Walter Doar, Jr., MCNAIR LAW FIRM, P.A., Georgetown, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Jesse R. Lance appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. See Lance v.

Williams, No. CA-02-1316-2 (D.S.C. Nov. 24, 2003). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -