Lance v. Dobson

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Lance v. Dobson

22 S.C.L. 301

DecidedFebruary 20, 1837

StatusPublished

This text of 22 S.C.L. 301 (Lance v. Dobson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lance v. Dobson, 22 S.C.L. 301 (S.C. Ct. App. 1837).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Evans

delivered the opinion of the court.

There is nothing in the escheat act, (1 Brevard, 305,) which gives traversers of escheat, a precedence on the docket, over other cases. The act says, such cases shall be heard without delay. But that is the law in relation to ajl cases on the docket. The motion is dismissed.

JOSIAH J. EVANS.

We concur,

RICHARD GANTT, JOHN B. O’NEALL, J. 8. UCHARÜSON, A. P. BUTLER.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Evans

delivered the opinion of the court.

There is nothing in the escheat act, (1 Brevard, 305,) which gives traversers of escheat, a precedence on the docket, over other cases. The act says, such cases shall be heard without delay. But that is the law in relation to ajl cases on the docket. The motion is dismissed.

JOSIAH J. EVANS.

We concur,

RICHARD GANTT, JOHN B. O’NEALL, J. 8. UCHARÜSON, A. P. BUTLER.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

22 S.C.L. 301, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lance-v-dobson-scctapp-1837.