Lance v. Boling

235 P. 279, 114 Or. 372
Oregon Supreme Court·Decided April 21, 1925·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

— These two cases were heard on January 15, 1925, on all the issues therein and taken under advisement. On examination of. the record it was discovered that an essential part of the testimony is not in the record, thus rendering it impossible to examine properly the questions involved. [373]*373Although repeated notifications have been sent to counsel on both sides to produce the missing testimony, all efforts in that direction have been unavailing and the record is still in such condition that no intelligent decision can be framed. For these reasons the decrees of the Circuit Court are affirmed pro forma, but without costs or disbursements in favor of either party in this court. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lance v. Boling, 235 P. 279, 114 Or. 372 (Or. 1925).

235 P. 279 (Lance v. Boling) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wendt v. Eastern Oregon Land Co.
241 P. 988 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1925)
Re Water Rights of Burnt River
241 P. 988 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1925)