Lance Taylor v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedDecember 19, 2019
Docket13-18-00384-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Lance Taylor v. State (Lance Taylor v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lance Taylor v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

NUMBER 13-18-00384-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

LANCE TAYLOR, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On appeal from the 28th District Court of Nueces County, Texas.

ORDER OF ABATEMENT Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Longoria and Perkes Order Per Curiam

Appellant’s brief was originally due on April 17, 2019. On June 21, 2019, this

Court granted by order appellant’s second amended motion for extension of time and

directed appellant to file the brief on or before July 17, 2019. On July 19, 2019, the Clerk

of the Court notified appellant’s counsel that the brief had not been filed and requested a response concerning the failure to file the brief within ten days. Counsel failed to

respond. After an order of abatement, remand, and reinstatement all related to

appellant’s counsel’s failure to submit a brief, on December 3, 2019, the Clerk of the Court

notified appellant’s counsel that the brief has not been filed and requested a response

within ten days. Counsel has nevertheless failed to file an appellate brief in this matter.

Accordingly, we now ABATE this appeal and REMAND the cause to the trial court

for further proceedings pursuant to Rule 38.8(b)(2) and (3) of the Texas Rules of Appellate

Procedure. Upon remand, the trial court shall utilize whatever means necessary to make

appropriate findings and recommendations concerning the following: (1) whether

appellant desires to prosecute this appeal; (2) why appellant's counsel has failed to file a

brief and whether counsel has effectively abandoned the appeal; (3) whether appellant

has been denied effective assistance of counsel; (4) whether appellant's counsel should

be removed; and (5) whether appellant is indigent and entitled to court-appointed counsel.

If the trial court determines that appellant does want to continue the appeal, that

present counsel should be removed, and that appellant is indigent and entitled to

court-appointed counsel, the trial court shall appoint new counsel to represent appellant

in this appeal. If new counsel is appointed, the name, address, email address,

telephone number, and state bar number of said counsel shall be included in an order

appointing counsel.

The trial court shall cause its findings and recommendations, together with any

orders it may enter regarding the aforementioned issues, to be included in a supplemental

clerk's record. Furthermore, the trial court shall cause a supplemental reporter's record

2 of any proceedings to be prepared. The supplemental clerk's record and supplemental

reporter's record, if any, shall be filed with the Clerk of this Court on or before the

expiration of thirty days from the date of this order.

It is so ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the 19th day of December, 2019.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Lance Taylor v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lance-taylor-v-state-texapp-2019.