Lance Nero v. the State of Texas
This text of Lance Nero v. the State of Texas (Lance Nero v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion issued September 14, 2023
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-22-00225-CR NO. 01-22-00226-CR ——————————— LANCE NERO, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the County Criminal Court at Law No. 4 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case Nos. 2286260 and 2323605
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant, Lance Nero, appealed from the judgments revoking community
supervision imposed on March 21, 2022 in the underlying cases. The notices of
appeal were filed by appellant’s court appointed trial counsel. Appellant’s court-appointed trial counsel also moved to withdraw as appellant’s counsel in each
of the underlying cases. The trial court allowed counsel to withdraw, found that
appellant was indigent for the purpose of employing counsel and paying for the
clerk’s and reporter’s records, and granted appellant’s motions to appoint appellate
counsel. However, the trial court did not appoint counsel to represent appellant on
appeal at that time.
Accordingly, on June 29, 2023, the Court abated each of these appeals and
directed the trial court to appoint counsel to represent appellant in his appeals. On
August 9, 2023, a supplemental clerk’s record was filed with the Court which
included a July 6, 2023 order appointing Taylor Allison Landis Mathis as counsel
for appellant in his appeals.
On August 31, 2023, appellant filed a motion to dismiss his appeals, stating
that he “no longer wishe[d] to prosecute his appeal[s]” and requesting that “this
Court grant [his] motion and dismiss th[ese] appeals.”
Appellant and his attorney have signed the motion, and this Court has not
issued a decision. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a). Further, more than ten days have
passed, and the State has not expressed opposition to appellant’s motion. See TEX.
R. APP. P. 10.3(a)(2).
2 Accordingly, we reinstate the cases on the Court’s active docket, grant
appellant’s motion and dismiss the appeals. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a), 43.2(f). We
dismiss any other pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Kelly, Landau, and Farris. Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Lance Nero v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lance-nero-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2023.