Lancaster v. Whiteside
This text of 33 S.E. 995 (Lancaster v. Whiteside) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Where one has bona fide purchased cotton from a tenant, without notice or knowledge that the tenant’s landlord had a lien thereon for rent, the landlord has no right of action against such purchaser for the value of the cotton. Under this rule of law there' was sufficient evidence to support the verdict of the jury for the defendant in the justice’s court, and there was therefore no error in overruling the petition for certiorari, the only ground of error complained of being that the verdict was contrary to law and the evidence. Worrill v. Barnes, 57 Ga. 404; Thornton v. Carver, 80 Ga. 397. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
33 S.E. 995, 108 Ga. 801, 1899 Ga. LEXIS 442, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lancaster-v-whiteside-ga-1899.