Lancaster v. Thacker
239 U.S. 625, 36 S. Ct. 162, 60 L. Ed. 473, 1915 U.S. LEXIS 1406
This text of 239 U.S. 625 (Lancaster v. Thacker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Lancaster v. Thacker, 239 U.S. 625, 36 S. Ct. 162, 60 L. Ed. 473, 1915 U.S. LEXIS 1406 (1915).
Opinion
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Consolidated Turnpike v. Norfolk &c. Railway Co., 228 U. S. 596, 600; Manhattan Life Insurance Co. v. Cohen, 234 U. S. 123, 137; Easterling Lumber Co. v. Pierce, 235 U. S. 380; (2) Mugler v. Kansas, 123 U. S. 623; Rippey v. Texas, 193 U. S. 504; Eberle v. Michigan, 232 U. S. 700.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Mugler v. Kansas
123 U.S. 623 (Supreme Court, 1887)
Rippey v. Texas
193 U.S. 504 (Supreme Court, 1904)
Consolidated Turnpike Co. v. Norfolk & Ocean View Railway Co.
228 U.S. 596 (Supreme Court, 1913)
Eberle v. Michigan
232 U.S. 700 (Supreme Court, 1914)
Manhattan Life Ins. Co. of NY v. Cohen
234 U.S. 123 (Supreme Court, 1914)
Easterling Lumber Co. v. Pierce
235 U.S. 380 (Supreme Court, 1914)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
239 U.S. 625, 36 S. Ct. 162, 60 L. Ed. 473, 1915 U.S. LEXIS 1406, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lancaster-v-thacker-scotus-1915.