Lancaster v. State of Florida
This text of Lancaster v. State of Florida (Lancaster v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
TERRY C. LANCASTER,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
No. 2D2024-0466
February 12, 2025
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Philip J. Federico, Judge.
Terry C. Lancaster, pro se.
John M. Guard, Acting Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Tayna Alexander, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.
BLACK, Judge. Terry Lancaster appeals from the order denying his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) motion and the sanction order barring him from filing further pro se pleadings in circuit court case number CRC00- 02032CFANO. To the extent Lancaster challenges the order denying his rule 3.800(a) motion, the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was filed more than thirty days after rendition of that order. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(1); Fla. R. App. P. 9.110(b); cf. Garson v. State, 338 So. 3d 301, 302 (Fla. 4th DCA 2022). To the extent Lancaster challenges the sanction order, we affirm without comment. Dismissed in part; affirmed in part.
SILBERMAN and VILLANTI, JJ., Concur.
Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Lancaster v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lancaster-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2025.