Lancaster v. State
This text of 64 So. 2d 109 (Lancaster v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This cause is before us on petition for writ of certiorari to review and revise the judgment of the Court of Appeals in the case of Sherman Lancaster v. State, Ala. App., 64 So.2d 109.
The Court of Appeals rendered no opinion in the case, simply writing upon the record “Affirmed (No. op.) Harwood, J.”
We have held that in the absence of an opinion by the Court of Appeals, we had nothing to review. Counts v. State, 240 Ala. 530, 200 So. 113; Washington v. City of Birmingham, 256 Ala. 121, 53 So.2d 624.
It follows, therefore, that the writ must be denied.
Writ denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
64 So. 2d 109, 258 Ala. 561, 1953 Ala. LEXIS 121, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lancaster-v-state-ala-1953.