Lancaster v. State

64 So. 2d 109, 258 Ala. 561, 1953 Ala. LEXIS 121
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided March 26, 1953·No. 8 Div. 708·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

LAWSON, Justice.

This cause is before us on petition for writ of certiorari to review and revise the judgment of the Court of Appeals in the case of Sherman Lancaster v. State, Ala. App., 64 So.2d 109.

The Court of Appeals rendered no opinion in the case, simply writing upon the record “Affirmed (No. op.) Harwood, J.”

We have held that in the absence of an opinion by the Court of Appeals, we had nothing to review. Counts v. State, 240 Ala. 530, 200 So. 113; Washington v. City of Birmingham, 256 Ala. 121, 53 So.2d 624.

It follows, therefore, that the writ must be denied.

Writ denied.

STAKELY, GOODWYN and MERRILL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lancaster v. State, 64 So. 2d 109, 258 Ala. 561, 1953 Ala. LEXIS 121 (Ala. 1953).

64 So. 2d 109 (Lancaster v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Honeycutt v. State
84 So. 2d 362 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1955)
Espey v. State
82 So. 2d 270 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1955)
Lancaster v. State
64 So. 2d 109 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1953)