Lancaster v. Monroe County
This text of 137 F.3d 1270 (Lancaster v. Monroe County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 96-6735 ________________________
D. C. Docket No. 95-0531-CB-C
CYLINDA H. LANCASTER, as the administratrix of the estate of Harold B. Lancaster,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
MONROE COUNTY, ALABAMA, Sheriff Thomas Tate; Monroe County Commission; Robert Rankins; Eddie Wells; and Ann Jackson,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama _________________________
(March 20, 1998)
Before BIRCH and CARNES, Circuit Judges and PROPST*, Senior District Judge.
* Honorable Robert B. Propst, Senior U.S. District Judge for the Northern District of Alabama, sitting by designation. PER CURIAM:
Consistent with our prior opinion in this case, see Lancaster v. Monroe County,
Alabama, 116 F.3d 1419, 1428-29 & n.11 (11th Cir. 1997), after our issuance of that opinion,
the parties moved for a stay of the mandate pending the results of mediation. We stayed the
mandate, and have now been informed that the parties have worked out a settlement of the
entire case, which they wish to effectuate in the district court.
Accordingly, we remand the entire case to the district court for that purpose. Our
mandate will issue forthwith and the parties may file the necessary papers in the district court
to effectuate their settlement.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
137 F.3d 1270, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lancaster-v-monroe-county-ca11-1998.