Lancaster v. Maple Street Homeowners Ass'n
582 S.E.2d 272, 357 N.C. 251
Opinion
1. Pits’ NOA Based Upon COA Dissent (COA02-666)
2. Def’s NOA Based Upon a Constitutional Question
3. Def’s PDR as to additional issues
2. Dismissed ex mero motu
3. Denied
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lancaster v. Maple Street Homeowners Ass'n, 582 S.E.2d 272, 357 N.C. 251 (N.C. 2003).
582 S.E.2d 272 (Lancaster v. Maple Street Homeowners Ass'n) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Rushing v. Aldridge
713 S.E.2d 566 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2011)
Jernigan v. Herring
633 S.E.2d 874 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2006)