Lancaster v. Houghton
266 U.S. 590, 45 S. Ct. 194
This text of 266 U.S. 590 (Lancaster v. Houghton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Lancaster v. Houghton, 266 U.S. 590, 45 S. Ct. 194 (1924).
Opinion
Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Stratton v. Stratton, 239 U. S. 55; Andrews v. Virginian Ry. Co., 248 U. S. 272, 275; Chicago Great Western R. R. Co. v. Basham, 249 U. S. 164, 167.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Stratton v. Stratton
239 U.S. 55 (Supreme Court, 1915)
Andrews v. Virginian Railway Co.
248 U.S. 272 (Supreme Court, 1919)
Chicago Great Western Railroad v. Basham
249 U.S. 164 (Supreme Court, 1919)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
266 U.S. 590, 45 S. Ct. 194, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lancaster-v-houghton-scotus-1924.