Lancaster v. Flowers
48 A. 896, 198 Pa. 614, 1901 Pa. LEXIS 850
Opinion
Upon a careful examination of the testimony in this case, and upon due consideration of the arguments made in it, the decree is affirmed on the opinion of the learned judge of the court below.
Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed at the cost of the appellants.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lancaster v. Flowers, 48 A. 896, 198 Pa. 614, 1901 Pa. LEXIS 850 (Pa. 1901).
48 A. 896 (Lancaster v. Flowers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Schwab v. GMAC Mtg Corp
Third Circuit, 2003
William G. Schwab v. Gmac Mortgage Corp. William G. Schwab, Esquire, in His Capacity as Chapter 7 Trustee
333 F.3d 135 (Third Circuit, 2003)
Jefferson Bank v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company
965 F.2d 1274 (Third Circuit, 1992)
Williams v. New Cumberland Borough
31 Pa. D. & C.3d 355 (Cumberland County Court of Common Pleas, 1984)
Duross v. Trainor
10 P.2d 763 (California Court of Appeal, 1932)
Reiff v. Pepo
139 A. 144 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1927)
Meixell's Estate
6 Pa. D. & C. 303 (Lancaster County Orphans' Court, 1924)
Bell v. Sage
212 P. 404 (California Court of Appeal, 1922)
Shields v. Aitken
84 A. 662 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1912)
Manning v. Bader
73 A. 939 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1909)
Holbrook's Estate
62 A. 368 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1905)
Lancaster v. Flowers
57 A. 526 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1904)