Lancaster v. County Auditor
14 F. Cas. 1062, 2 Dill. 478
Opinion
We hold that the plaintiff had the right to redeem; that the auditor had no right to refuse to issue the redemption certificate, and that it was his duty to receive the money tendered by the owner of the regular title. The existence of an outstanding deed could not prevent the owner from protecting his interest from the inception of a new estate under the last sale. Decree accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lancaster v. County Auditor, 14 F. Cas. 1062, 2 Dill. 478 (circtdia 1873).
14 F. Cas. 1062 (Lancaster v. County Auditor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hillis v. O'Keefe
75 N.E. 147 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1905)