Lancaster v. Casey

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-6077

MILTON E. LANCASTER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

W.C. CASEY; JERRY MONETTE,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:05-ct-00586-BO)

Submitted: March 23, 2006 Decided: March 31, 2006

Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Milton E. Lancaster, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Milton E. Lancaster appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint as frivolous. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. See Lancaster v. Casey, No. 5:05-ct-00586-BO (E.D.N.C. Nov.

4, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -