Lanasa v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Lanasa v. State

860 S.W.2d 398, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1411, 1993 WL 335387

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 7, 1993·No. No. 63419·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 Motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 Motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Lanasa v. State, 860 S.W.2d 398, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1411, 1993 WL 335387 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

860 S.W.2d 398 (Lanasa v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.