Lanahan v. Lentini

457 So. 2d 589, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2203, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15560
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 16, 1984
DocketNo. 84-531
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 457 So. 2d 589 (Lanahan v. Lentini) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lanahan v. Lentini, 457 So. 2d 589, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2203, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15560 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court’s order dismissing the instant case is reversed upon a holding that a trial court is precluded “from exercising its supposed inherent, discretionary power to dismiss a case for failure to prosecute when, as in this case, there is activity of record within one year prior to the dismissal,” American Salvage & Jobbing Co. v. Salomon, 367 So.2d 716, 717 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); see Rivera v. A.M.I.F., Inc., 417 So.2d 304 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982), and this rule cannot be circumvented under the guise of dismissing the case on the ground that the plaintiff failed to respond to the court’s order requiring it to explain its inaction in the case where such inaction was for a period of less than a year.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Feldman v. Renault Motors
550 So. 2d 31 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Glassalum Engineering v. 392208 Ontario Ltd.
487 So. 2d 87 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
457 So. 2d 589, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2203, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15560, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lanahan-v-lentini-fladistctapp-1984.