Lana Perez v. Saks Fifth Avenue, Inc.
This text of 379 F. App'x 801 (Lana Perez v. Saks Fifth Avenue, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The district judge, in a well-reasoned order, granted Saks Fifth Avenue, Inc.’s renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 50(b). He found that the judgment was warranted because “no reasonable juror could conclude that in taking adverse employment action against Plaintiffs, Phelan acted as a mere [conduit] for Terbecki or Salerno’s age animus or retaliatory motives.” Perez v. Saks Fifth Avenue, Inc., 592 F.Supp.2d 1388, 1399-1400 (S.D.Fla.2009). We have carefully reviewed the record and the court’s order, and we conclude that the court properly granted judgment as a matter of law. We therefore affirm the judgment of the district court. As a result, Saks’s conditional cross-appeal from the denial of its alternative motion for new trial pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 50(b) and 59(a) is moot.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
379 F. App'x 801, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lana-perez-v-saks-fifth-avenue-inc-ca11-2010.