Lamura v. Lamura, No. Fa98 0168443 S (Apr. 13, 2000)

Connecticut Superior Court

Lamura v. Lamura, No. Fa98 0168443 S (Apr. 13, 2000)

2000 Conn. Super. Ct. 3979

Connecticut Superior Court·Decided April 13, 2000·No. No. FA98 0168443 S·Unpublished

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

AMENDED MEMORANDUM OF DECISION de PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR CONTEMPT POST JUDGMENT/ MOTION FOR ORDER, POST JUDGMENT (#166) The memorandum issued on February 2, 2000 that ruled on motion # 166 is amended by restating the second sentence of the first paragraph to read as follows:

"A new hearing on the educational needs of the minor may be necessary to determine what is in her best interests, cf. Hardisty v. Hardisty, 183 Conn. 253 (1981)."

The sentence is amended to delete the mandatory language in the original sentence.

HARRIGAN, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

AMENDED MEMORANDUM OF DECISION de PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR CONTEMPT POST JUDGMENT/ MOTION FOR ORDER, POST JUDGMENT (#166) The memorandum issued on February 2, 2000 that ruled on motion # 166 is amended by restating the second sentence of the first paragraph to read as follows:

"A new hearing on the educational needs of the minor may be necessary to determine what is in her best interests, cf. Hardisty v. Hardisty, 183 Conn. 253 (1981)."

The sentence is amended to delete the mandatory language in the original sentence.

HARRIGAN, J.

Lamura v. Lamura, No. Fa98 0168443 S (Apr. 13, 2000), 2000 Conn. Super. Ct. 3979 (Colo. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

2000 Conn. Super. Ct. 3979 (Lamura v. Lamura, No. Fa98 0168443 S (Apr. 13, 2000)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related