Home/Connecticut Superior Court/Lamura v. Lamura, No. Fa98 0168443 S (Apr. 13, 2000)

Lamura v. Lamura, No. Fa98 0168443 S (Apr. 13, 2000)

2000 Conn. Super. Ct. 3979
CourtConnecticut Superior Court
DecidedApril 13, 2000
DocketNo. FA98 0168443 S
StatusUnpublished

This text of 2000 Conn. Super. Ct. 3979 (Lamura v. Lamura, No. Fa98 0168443 S (Apr. 13, 2000)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lamura v. Lamura, No. Fa98 0168443 S (Apr. 13, 2000), 2000 Conn. Super. Ct. 3979 (Colo. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

AMENDED MEMORANDUM OF DECISION de PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR CONTEMPT POST JUDGMENT/ MOTION FOR ORDER, POST JUDGMENT (#166)
The memorandum issued on February 2, 2000 that ruled on motion # 166 is amended by restating the second sentence of the first paragraph to read as follows:

"A new hearing on the educational needs of the minor may be necessary to determine what is in her best interests, cf. Hardisty v. Hardisty, 183 Conn. 253 (1981)."

The sentence is amended to delete the mandatory language in the original sentence.

HARRIGAN, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hardisty v. Hardisty
439 A.2d 307 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2000 Conn. Super. Ct. 3979, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lamura-v-lamura-no-fa98-0168443-s-apr-13-2000-connsuperct-2000.