Lamula v. Power
192 N.E.2d 725, 13 N.Y.2d 873
Opinion
Order reversed and the prayer of the petition granted, without costs. We hold that there was no substantial violation of the requirement of section 135 of the Election Law that the pages of such a petition be “ numbered consecutively ”. We hold, also, that, under all the circumstances, the objectors were properly before the court. No opinion.
Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Van Voorhis, Burke, Foster and Scileppi. •
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lamula v. Power, 192 N.E.2d 725, 13 N.Y.2d 873 (N.Y. 1963).
192 N.E.2d 725 (Lamula v. Power) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Halley v. LaFuente
176 A.D.2d 723 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
Codd v. Barbaro
111 Misc. 2d 135 (New York Supreme Court, 1981)
Cappellazzi v. Toto
41 N.Y. 1050 (New York Court of Appeals, 1977)
Butler v. Hayduk
336 N.E.2d 423 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)