Lamson v. Lamson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Lamson v. Lamson

116 S.E.2d 789, 253 N.C. 336, 1960 N.C. LEXIS 508

DecidedNovember 9, 1960

StatusPublished

This text of 116 S.E.2d 789 (Lamson v. Lamson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lamson v. Lamson, 116 S.E.2d 789, 253 N.C. 336, 1960 N.C. LEXIS 508 (N.C. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

Peh CüRiam.

The plaintiff sought relief under G.S. 50-16. Her complaint states a cause of action for abandonment and failure to support under that section. Rule 4(a).,.Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court (242 N.C. 766) permits appeal neither from an order on a motion to strike nor from an order overruling a demurrer, unless for misjoinder of parties and causes. However, the defendant had the right to prosecute his appeal from the order allowing alimony. The record fails to show merit in the appeal.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Peh CüRiam.

The plaintiff sought relief under G.S. 50-16. Her complaint states a cause of action for abandonment and failure to support under that section. Rule 4(a).,.Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court (242 N.C. 766) permits appeal neither from an order on a motion to strike nor from an order overruling a demurrer, unless for misjoinder of parties and causes. However, the defendant had the right to prosecute his appeal from the order allowing alimony. The record fails to show merit in the appeal.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

116 S.E.2d 789, 253 N.C. 336, 1960 N.C. LEXIS 508, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lamson-v-lamson-nc-1960.