Home/New York Court of Common Pleas/Lamson Consolidated Store Service Co. v. Conyngham

Lamson Consolidated Store Service Co. v. Conyngham

10 Misc. 772
New York Court of Common Pleas·Decided July 1, 1894·Published

Opinion

Per Owriam.

As plaintiff’s exhibit is not contained in the return, the appeal must be reheard at the Additional General Term of this court to be held December 20, 1894, the return to be amended meanwhile by the addition of said exhibit. Robinson v. Fioken, handed down herewith.

Present: Bischoff and Giegerich, JJ.

Reargument ordered; papers to be amended.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lamson Consolidated Store Service Co. v. Conyngham, 10 Misc. 772 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1894).

10 Misc. 772 (Lamson Consolidated Store Service Co. v. Conyngham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.